Quality or Quantity (Which Does Your Home Have?)

By Scott Sidler • October 28, 2013

Image credit: greggr / 123RF Stock Photo
Image credit: greggr / 123RF Stock Photo

I grew up in Texas so I like everything big. Big sky, big acreage, big pickup trucks and big steaks. There’s something about a 36 oz steak called the “widow maker” that appeals to me. Maybe it’s the challenge. Maybe it’s just the idea of seeing a steak that size. Whatever it is, I’m intrigued.

Just because I appreciate the Texas mentality of ‘bigger is better’  doesn’t mean I’m a fan of all things big. America has taken Texas’ good idea and turned it into something all wrong. 36 oz of dry-aged prime ribeye steak is better than 8 oz of that same steak. That’s just more of a good thing! But 36 oz of cheap dollar store steak (is there such a thing?) is not better than 8 oz of that amazing ribeye. And that is exactly where America has gone wrong.

We have much bigger houses than our parents did, and frighteningly larger than our grandparents ever dreamed of, but what has it actually gotten us. We build cheap, quickly assembled dollar store houses that barely last 20 years. Our grandparents, on the other hand, lived in small works of art built by skilled craftsman. We traded quality for quantity and lost our way in the process.

A couple of my friends live in a nice looking townhouse built in 2010 here in the Orlando area. Their townhouse is one of 725 units built exactly the same. And this year the entire complex had to have the exterior stucco completely redone. The builder had been sued two times before for cutting corners and shoddy stucco work. This would have been the third time had the company not agreed to fix the problem before being dragged into court again.


That stucco lasted 2 years before it failed. 2 years! But they manage to keep getting huge contracts to build in the area because they are fast and affordable. When are we going to learn that going with the lowest bidder usually isn’t the best idea.

If you live in a historic house you probably get what I’m saying. You can appreciate the hand troweled plaster, the ornate woodwork, the cast iron tub, the hundred year old windows that though they may be caked with paint still hold their own.

Quality is not absent from an old house. It is everywhere. From the roof to the floor, it was meticulously built with care and technique. Your old house may only be half the size of the sprawling McMansions around town, but what it lacks in quantity it more than makes up for in quality. And I would rather have just a single bite of filet mignon than a plate full of dollar store steak.

Share Away!

4 thoughts on “Quality or Quantity (Which Does Your Home Have?)”

  1. I couldn’t agree more. As an example, I walked into my brother in laws house that was so much bigger than our 1937 farmhouse, and of course newer, but there was laminate wood on the floor, and not even any moulding a on the windows! His toilet rocked, the tub was plastic and if his upstairs floors were made of flake board I wouldn’t have been surprised. Our old and “ugly” house that was a third of the price (with yes, a third less bathrooms) with good bones showed us as time went on, it had a solid leak proof basement, oak wainscot long since painted over, and wood boards as subfloor, not plywood. Looks are always deceiving and if my house has stood strong since ’37 it will probably continue to long after I’m gone.

  2. SO TRUE!!!! Funny you bring up the stucco issue as I also have friends whose stucco is coming off their new house after only a few years, and my stucco house built in 1924 has nothing but a few cracks now and then.

Leave a comment!

Keep the conversation going! Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.